Federal 14 CFR part 107 is the national floor for commercial small UAS. Kansas does not issue a separate statewide commercial drone license beyond a remote pilot certificate. What commercial operators miss when they stop at Part 107 are state privacy/harassment definitions that expressly mention unmanned aerial systems, KDWP public-lands and wildlife-take rules, and—when you sell to Kansas government—agency purchasing restrictions on certain foreign drone components. This summarizes primary materials pulled 28 Sep 2026. It is a statute explainer, not legal advice. Confirm the current section before a job, and consult counsel when a flight sits near dwellings, KDWP land, wildlife take, or a state procurement file.
Part 107 is the federal floor; Kansas adds place-, privacy-, and wildlife-based rules
A remote pilot certificate, registration where required, Remote ID, and airspace authorization remain the federal baseline. Kansas commercial work still runs under Part 107 unless another FAA path applies. See Part 107 waiver basics and sister state explainers such as Missouri commercial drone laws, Oklahoma commercial drone laws, and Arkansas commercial drone laws.
Kansas commercial drone laws are not a second FAA certificate. They are whether the flight intersects the Protection from Stalking Act’s UAS harassment definition, whether the site is KDWP-managed land, whether the mission involves taking or locating wildlife, and—separately—whether a Kansas governmental buyer can acquire the aircraft or components under state purchasing rules.
Treat House Substitute for Senate Bill 271 (2024) foreign-components proposals as not law—that bill was vetoed. Do not treat blogs as authority for “Kansas just banned…” claims.
K.S.A. 60-31a02: UAS harassment inside the Protection from Stalking Act (definitions)
K.S.A. 60-31a02 (also on the Kansas Legislature statute page) is a definitions section for the protection from stalking, sexual assault or human trafficking act.
Under § 60-31a02(d), stalking means an intentional harassment of another person that places the other person in reasonable fear for that person’s safety. Harassment means a knowing and intentional course of conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments or terrorizes the person, and that serves no legitimate purpose. The statute then states that “Harassment” shall include any course of conduct carried out through the use of an unmanned aerial system over or near any dwelling, occupied vehicle or other place where one may reasonably expect to be safe from uninvited intrusion or surveillance.
Course of conduct means conduct consisting of two or more separate acts over a period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose which would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of “course of conduct.”
Unmanned aerial system is defined in § 60-31a02(e) as a powered aerial vehicle that does not carry a human operator; uses aerodynamic forces to provide lift; may fly autonomously or be piloted remotely; may be expendable or recoverable; and may carry a lethal or nonlethal payload.
Commercial takeaway — invent no fine from the definitions section
This section tells you how UAS conduct can fit the Act’s harassment definition. It does not itself state a dollar fine. Civil protection-from-stalking petitions and other Act remedies can follow from the broader Act—read the operative remedy sections with counsel; this article does not invent Class A labels, dollar tables, or “typical ticket” folklore from § 60-31a02 alone. KS Department of Wildlife and Parks also points readers to § 60-31a02 on its drone FAQ for privacy context (KDWP Regulations & Statutes / drone FAQ).
Legitimate commercial work with landowner consent, a bona fide business purpose, and Part 107 compliance is still not a license to fly a course of conduct over dwellings or occupied vehicles in a way that meets the statutory harassment definition. Map the flight path and camera intent before you treat “Part 107 alone” as enough near homes.
KDWP land and wildlife: cite the statute carefully; read the KDWP FAQ
K.S.A. 32-1003 — unlawful methods of taking wildlife
K.S.A. 32-1003 makes it unlawful, unless authorized by law or KDWP rules, among other things:
- To take any game animal or furbearing animal from a motorboat, airplane, motor vehicle or other water, air or land vehicle (with a handicapped hunting/fishing permit exception under K.S.A. 32-931); and
- To provide or receive information concerning the location of any game animal or furbearing animal by radio or other mechanical device for purposes of taking such bird or animal.
The statute text pulled 28 Sep 2026 does not use the word “drone” or “UAS.” Frame it as written: an aircraft-/vehicle-based take ban and a mechanical-device location-for-take ban. Penalties are referred to K.S.A. 32-1031 (and related sections)—this article invents no dollar amounts.
KDWP FAQ application to drones
The KDWP drone FAQ states that drones may not be used for hunting or scouting in Kansas, citing federal 16 U.S.C. § 742j-1 and K.S.A. 32-1003 as prohibiting the use of aircraft to take wildlife. The same FAQ states drones may not be used to locate wounded or harvested game (referencing the definition of take in K.S.A. 32-701), and that filming hunts on KDWP-owned/managed land is not permitted. Cite the FAQ and the statute separately—do not rewrite § 32-1003 as if it literally said “drone.”
K.A.R. 115-8-13 and KDWP-managed property
KDWP’s FAQ states that drone (UAS/UAV) use is not permitted at any Kansas State Park, Wildlife Area, or other property owned or managed by KDWP, citing K.A.R. 115-8-13, and that a list of state parks with designated UAS operating areas is still in development. Verify the live KAR text and the park office the same day before you plan a commercial flight on or over KDWP land. KDWP’s FAQ characterizes unlawful drone use on KDWP lands as a Class C misdemeanor that can result in fines or jail time—quote that as KDWP’s own FAQ language; do not invent a separate dollar fine table here. Contact the state park or regional office for site-specific questions.
Commercial takeaway: private-property mapping with consent is a different screening problem from KDWP land and from any mission that looks like take, scout-for-take, or locate-for-take of wildlife.
Government procurement: K.S.A. 75-3740h (agency purchasing—not a civilian flight ban)
K.S.A. 75-3740h (History: L. 2025, ch. 68, § 12; July 1) restricts governmental agency purchase or acquisition of drones or related services, maintenance agreements, or equipment whose critical components were produced in a country of concern or produced or owned by a foreign principal, with listed exceptions, grandfathering for certain pre–July 1, 2025 components, and a narrow secretary-of-administration approval path. Contracts entered into before July 1, 2025 are carved out in subsection (d).
Frame this correctly: it is an agency purchasing rule that matters when you sell aircraft, components, or related services to Kansas government. It is not a statewide civilian flight ban and not a second Part 107 certificate. Confirm defined terms (“country of concern,” “foreign principal,” “critical components”) in the companion statute sections the same day you bid a state file. Invent no civilian fine from this purchasing section.
Local ordinances (verify; invent no fines)
Cities such as Wichita or Prairie Village may have local UAS or park rules that are easy to mis-cite from blogs. Treat municipal codes as a same-day checklist with the city—this article invents no ordinance fine amounts. Part 107 still does not preempt every local land-use or park rule that can affect launch sites.
Practical checklist for Kansas commercial flights
- Confirm the federal floor under 14 CFR part 107.
- Screen dwelling / occupied-vehicle / privacy-sensitive paths against K.S.A. 60-31a02 UAS harassment definitions (two or more acts; course of conduct)—no invented fines from the definitions section.
- If the site is a state park, wildlife area, or other KDWP-managed property, read the KDWP drone FAQ and verify K.A.R. 115-8-13 / park office guidance the same day.
- If the mission involves wildlife take, scouting for take, or locating game, read K.S.A. 32-1003 as written (aircraft/vehicle take; mechanical location-for-take), 16 U.S.C. § 742j-1, and the KDWP FAQ—do not invent dollar penalties; see K.S.A. 32-1031 schedule with counsel if needed.
- If the buyer is a Kansas governmental agency acquiring drones/components/services, screen K.S.A. 75-3740h—purchasing rule, not a civilian flight ban.
- Do not treat vetoed 2024 House Sub SB 271 as enacted law.
- For business process around clients, invoices, and job files after the legal screen, some operators keep a light ops stack—see Pilot Ledger only if that fits your shop; it is optional tooling, not a compliance substitute.
What this explainer is not
- Not a second statewide commercial drone license beyond Part 107
- Not legal advice or a substitute for counsel on a stalking petition, wildlife citation, or procurement protest
- Not authority to invent dollar fines from K.S.A. 60-31a02 definitions or from blog summaries of KDWP penalties
- Not a claim that vetoed 2024 House Sub SB 271 is current law
- Not permission to fly KDWP land because you hold a remote pilot certificate
Keep the flight file boring and documented: consent, path near dwellings, KDWP land status, wildlife purpose (or lack of it), and—if the buyer is government—procurement constraints on the airframe.
Sister reading
For neighboring-state commercial floors, see Missouri commercial drone laws, Oklahoma commercial drone laws, and Arkansas commercial drone laws. For federal operating permissions beyond the basic rules, see Part 107 waiver basics.
Bottom line
Kansas commercial drone laws beyond the FAA center on Part 107 as the floor, K.S.A. 60-31a02 UAS harassment definitions inside the Protection from Stalking Act, KDWP land and wildlife rules (statute text + KDWP FAQ, carefully framed), and agency purchasing limits under K.S.A. 75-3740h when you sell to government. Invent no fine tables from definitions sections. Confirm primary text the same day you fly. This page is educational, not legal advice.
About The DroneLaws.us Team
›Contact The DroneLaws.us Team
Your message goes to the DroneLaws.us editorial inbox and is passed to The DroneLaws.us Team. We never publish author email addresses.
Stay compliant. Stay organized.
PilotLedger keeps your flight logs, clients, quotes, invoices, and compliance records in one place.
Try PilotLedger freeMore from the blog
- Part 107 Recurrent Training and Keeping Your Certificate CurrentPart 107 recurrent training under 14 CFR § 107.65—24 calendar months of aeronautical knowledge recency, FAASTeam ALC-677 / ALC-515, and why the certificate itself does not expire.
- Oklahoma Commercial Drone Laws (Beyond the FAA)Part 107 is the federal floor. Oklahoma adds 3 O.S. § 322 (critical infrastructure overflight limits with a commercial FAA-authorized carve-out and civil liability) and 21 O.S. § 1743 (UAS privacy and private-property misdemeanor rules).
- Part 107 Visual Observer Rules on a Commercial JobPart 107 visual observer rules on commercial jobs: how 14 CFR §§ 107.3, 107.31, and 107.33 define the VO role, VLOS, and crew communication—educational, not legal advice.
This site provides general information about drone laws and is not legal advice. DroneLaws.us is not affiliated with the FAA or any government agency. Consult a qualified attorney for legal advice regarding your specific situation.