FCC Proposes Banning Import & Sale of “Military-Grade” Foreign-Made Drones
The FCC is taking public comment on a proposal to prohibit the continued importation and marketing of previously authorized foreign-produced drones that carry thermal imaging, LiDAR, swarming, spray, or docking capability — or that weigh 55 pounds or more. Drones already owned would remain legal to fly. The comment window closes September 2, 2026.
DroneLaws.us provides this information for awareness. We encourage all drone operators to review the proposal and submit their own comments.
We take no position for or against this proposal. Everything below is drawn from the FCC's own Public Notice and its Federal Register publication, linked at the bottom of this page. This is general information, not legal advice — consult a qualified attorney about your specific situation.
1. At a Glance
| Proceeding | PS Docket No. 26-189 |
|---|---|
| Document | Public Notice DA 26-758 |
| Issued by | FCC Public Safety & Homeland Security Bureau and Office of Engineering and Technology |
| Released | July 21, 2026 |
| Federal Register | 91 FR 48870 (August 3, 2026) |
| Comments due | September 2, 2026 |
| What it would prohibit | Continued importation and marketing (including sale) of covered foreign-produced “military-grade” UAS and UAS critical components |
| Effect on drones you already own | None proposed — continued use and operation would remain authorized |
| Wind-down | 180 days after Federal Register publication of a final decision |
2. How to File a Comment — Step by Step
Anyone can file. You do not need a lawyer, a company, or any credential, and it takes about ten minutes. Comments are due on or before September 2, 2026 through the FCC's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS).
Read this before you click through — it is the part that confuses everyone.
The FCC has no link that opens this docket's comment form directly. Every ECFS link lands you on a blank form or on a list of other people's filings. You have to type the proceeding number into the form yourself and pick it from the dropdown that appears. Copy it now and it is already on your clipboard when the form loads:
Open the Express Comment form
This is the short form for individual comments typed straight into the page — the right choice for almost every pilot. It opens in a new tab so this walkthrough stays on screen beside it.
Open the ECFS Express form →Filing a prepared PDF or a longer document instead? Use the Standard Filing form — same proceeding number, with a file upload.
Fill in the form, field by field
The fields below are the ones you will see on the ECFS form, in order.
- FieldProceeding NumberDon't miss thisEnter26-189
Type it, then wait for the dropdown and click 26-189 when it appears. The number has to be selected from that list — if you only type it and move on, the field will not register and the form will reject it. This is the step almost everyone gets stuck on.
- FieldName of FilerEnterYour name
Your own name is fine. You do not need a company or an attorney.
- FieldEmail AddressEnterYour email
Used for your confirmation receipt.
- FieldAddressEnterYour street, city, state, ZIP
Required. Note that ECFS filings are public record — your name and address will be publicly searchable, so use a business address if you would rather not publish your home one.
- FieldBrief CommentsEnterYour comment
This is the box your actual comment goes in. Use the starter below, but rewrite it in your own words — the FCC discounts identical form letters, and a specific first-hand account counts for far more.
- FieldEmail Confirmation / public record checkboxEnterToggle on, then check the box
Toggle the slider if you want an emailed receipt, then check the box acknowledging that your filing becomes part of the public record.
- FieldContinue to Review ScreenEnterClick it
Review your text, pass the human-verification check, and submit. You will get a confirmation number — save it. Your filing shows in the public docket, usually within a business day.
What to write in the “Brief Comments” box
A starting scaffold — copy it, then replace every bracket with your own facts. Filings that describe a real operation with real numbers carry weight; thousands of identical copies do not.
My name is [YOUR NAME] and I am a [Part 107 remote pilot / recreational flyer / business owner] in [CITY, STATE]. I am writing about PS Docket No. 26-189. What I do: [Describe your operation in a sentence or two — e.g. roof inspections for insurance adjusters, thermal searches for a volunteer SAR team, ag survey work on X acres, real estate photography.] Equipment I rely on: [List the aircraft and payloads, e.g. two DJI Matrice 30T thermal aircraft and a Mavic 3 Enterprise.] These fall under the proposed [thermal imaging / LiDAR / docking station / spray / 55-lb / swarming] category. What this proposal would mean for me: [Be concrete. What jobs could you no longer take? What happens when an aircraft is damaged and cannot be replaced? What would replacement cost — give dollar figures if you have them. Is there a domestic aircraft that does this job today, and have you priced it?] On the 180-day wind-down: [Would that be enough time for your operation to transition? Why or why not?] [Add anything else you want the FCC to understand about how this decision affects your work.] Thank you for considering my comment. [YOUR NAME] [CITY, STATE]
The Bureau specifically asked for these facts:
- • How many affected aircraft are in your fleet
- • What replacing them would cost
- • Whether a domestic alternative exists for your mission
- • Whether 180 days is enough time to transition
- • Whether the category definitions sweep in equipment that is not remotely military-grade
Be respectful and be direct. Staff read these filings — specifics get cited, insults get skimmed. Leave out phone numbers and anything business-confidential; the whole filing is public.
Confirm it landed
After submitting, you can look up the docket and see your filing in the public record — usually within a business day. This is also where you can read what other operators have written.
View filings in PS Docket No. 26-189 →3. What the FCC Proposed
On July 21, 2026, the FCC's Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau and Office of Engineering and Technology released Public Notice DA 26-758, opening PS Docket No. 26-189. It was published in the Federal Register on August 3, 2026 at 91 FR 48870, which started a 30-day comment clock ending September 2, 2026. It is a Bureau-level Public Notice seeking comment rather than a full Commission rulemaking, though it is widely being described as an NPRM.
Some background matters here. In December 2025 the FCC added all foreign-produced UAS and UAS critical components to its Covered List under the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act. Being on the Covered List blocks new equipment authorizations, but it did not revoke authorizations already granted — which is why previously approved models stayed on shelves. This proposal uses 47 CFR § 2.939(e) to limit those existing authorizations so the equipment can no longer be imported or marketed, without revoking the authorization itself.
Rather than reach every foreign-produced drone at once, the Bureau proposes to draw the line at aircraft it defines as “military-grade” based on seven capability categories, which it borrowed from other agencies' regulations governing high-risk UAS. Those categories are the heart of the proposal, and they are what most commercial operators will want to read closely.
The Bureau tentatively concluded that the economic and supply chain impact would be “relatively minor and contained,” reasoning that military-grade aircraft are a minority of the remaining market and that recreational flyers are unlikely to fly them. It specifically asked commenters to supply data and evidence on that point — including fleet inventories, replacement costs, domestic inventory on hand, devices in transit, and units under existing distribution or sales agreements. If your operation would be affected, that request is an open invitation to put your numbers in the record.
4. Which Drone Categories Are Affected
All seven categories from the Public Notice, in the order the FCC listed them. A drone needs to fall into only one of these — and be foreign-produced and on the Covered List — to be reached by the proposal.
UAS weighing 55 pounds or more at takeoff
Aircraft that are not “small unmanned aircraft” under FAA rules (14 CFR § 107.3). The FCC describes these as “larger platforms” offering greater payload capacity, endurance, and range.
In practice: Heavy-lift cinema and cargo platforms, large agricultural airframes, and most Part 137 / Section 44807 exemption aircraft.
UAS capable of dispensing “economic poison”
Aircraft able to dispense substances covered by FAA rules at 14 CFR § 137.3 — pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, rodenticides, defoliants, and drying agents.
In practice: Agricultural spray drones of essentially every size, including sub-55-lb spray platforms.
UAS containing or integrating thermal imaging sensors
Any aircraft whose sensors can “capture and translate the difference in temperature between objects, as well as an object’s heat signature and residual heat signature.”
In practice: Public safety and inspection drones with radiometric or non-radiometric thermal cameras, and any airframe sold bundled with a thermal payload.
UAS containing or integrating LiDAR sensors
Any aircraft integrating Light Detection and Ranging — a “remote sensing technology that measures distance by illuminating a target with a laser and analyzing the reflected light.”
In practice: Survey and mapping drones with LiDAR payloads — and, as written, consumer aircraft that use a small LiDAR/ToF module for low-light obstacle sensing.
UAS docking stations
“Multipurpose systems that enable UAS to land safely, take off, recharge and/or replace batteries, and transfer data and payload.” The FCC treats a dock as a UAS and/or a ground control station.
In practice: Drone-in-a-box systems used for automated site security, utility monitoring, and drone-as-first-responder programs.
UAS “specially designed to incorporate a defense article”
Aircraft falling under 22 CFR § 121.1, Category VIII(a)(5), referencing the ITAR definition of “defense article” at 22 CFR § 120.31.
In practice: Platforms built to carry ITAR-controlled payloads or effects.
Swarming UAS
Ground control stations purpose-built for — or aircraft integrated with flight control systems specially designed for — managing drone swarms that operate autonomously to coordinate, avoid collisions, hold formation, and respond to changing conditions; and, separately, UAS “purpose-built to perform flights in coordinated and synchronized formations, including applications such as multi-UAS light shows.”
In practice: Drone light show fleets and the software/ground stations that fly them, which the definition reaches explicitly.
The Bureau explicitly asked whether this list captures the right equipment — whether anything listed is not military-grade, and whether anything military-grade is missing. Comments addressing the scope of these definitions are directly responsive to what was asked.
5. Models That Appear to Fall Inside the Proposed Categories
Enterprise platforms with thermal and/or LiDAR
Why: Thermal imaging (category 3) and/or LiDAR (category 4)
- DJI Matrice 400
- DJI Matrice 4E / 4T (Matrice 4 Enterprise, Matrice 4 Thermal)
- DJI Matrice 30T
- DJI Matrice 350 RTK / Matrice 300 RTK with thermal or LiDAR payloads
- DJI Zenmuse H30T, H20T, L2 and comparable thermal/LiDAR payloads
- DJI Mavic 3 Thermal (M3T) and Mavic 3 Enterprise variants with thermal
- Autel EVO II Dual 640T and EVO Max 4T thermal variants
Consumer aircraft using LiDAR for obstacle sensing
Why: LiDAR (category 4) — the definition is not limited to survey-grade payloads
- DJI Air 3S
- DJI Mini 5 Pro
- Other consumer models shipping a forward LiDAR / time-of-flight module for low-light obstacle avoidance
Docking and automated deployment systems
Why: UAS docking stations (category 5)
- DJI Dock 2 and DJI Dock 3
- Autel Alpha / Autel Dock systems
- Foreign-produced drone-in-a-box systems generally
Agricultural spray aircraft
Why: Dispensing “economic poison” (category 2), plus takeoff weight (category 1)
- DJI Agras T50, T70, T100 and earlier Agras models
- XAG P-series and V-series spray platforms
Light show and formation fleets
Why: Swarming UAS (category 7)
- Foreign-produced multi-UAS light show aircraft and the ground control software built to fly them in synchronized formation
Because the thermal and LiDAR categories are written around the presence of a sensor rather than its grade, the practical reach extends well past enterprise hardware — it picks up consumer aircraft that use a small LiDAR module for low-light obstacle sensing, and any airframe sold bundled with a thermal payload. Several commenters and trade press have flagged exactly this point.
6. What Would NOT Be Affected
Drones you already own
The Public Notice states plainly that the prohibition “would not affect the continued use or operation of already-purchased UAS or UAS critical components.” Equipment authorizations would be limited, not revoked — aircraft already in your hands would remain authorized to fly.
Domestically produced drones and components
The prohibition reaches only equipment on the FCC Covered List, which lists foreign-produced UAS. Anything produced domestically is outside its scope entirely.
Blue UAS Cleared List aircraft
UAS and critical components on the DCMA Blue UAS Cleared List are currently exempt from the Covered List — and therefore from this proposal. Note that the Covered List records that exemption as running until January 1, 2027.
Buy American “domestic end products”
UAS and critical components qualifying as “domestic end products” under 48 CFR § 25.101(a) are exempt from the Covered List on the same January 1, 2027 timeline.
Equipment granted a Conditional Approval
Devices granted Conditional Approval by the Department of War or DHS are exempt, as is anything later removed from the Covered List.
“Toy Drones”
Foreign-produced “Toy Drones,” and toy drones containing foreign-produced components, were removed from the Covered List on June 15, 2026 and are outside this proposal.
Federal government use, testing, and product development
Importation and marketing for use by the federal government, and for commercial testing and product development, are expressly carved out.
Non-military-grade drones
Foreign-produced aircraft that fall into none of the seven categories are not covered by this particular proposal.
The short version on existing fleets: this is a supply-side action. It targets bringing aircraft into the country and offering them for sale. The Public Notice states that limiting an existing authorization “would not result in the revocation of an existing authorization” and “would not affect the continued use or operation of devices that consumers already possess.” Nothing in it grounds a drone you already own.
7. Timeline
December 22, 2025
FCC adds all foreign-produced UAS and UAS critical components to the Covered List, blocking new equipment authorizations.
January 7, 2026
Blue UAS Cleared List aircraft and Buy American “domestic end products” are exempted from the Covered List until January 1, 2027.
June 15, 2026
“Toy Drones” and toy drones containing foreign-produced components are removed from the Covered List.
July 21, 2026
Public Notice DA 26-758 released, opening PS Docket No. 26-189 and proposing the import and marketing prohibition for “military-grade” foreign-produced UAS.
August 3, 2026
Published in the Federal Register at 91 FR 48870, starting the 30-day comment clock.
September 2, 2026
Comments due in ECFS. This is the deadline that matters for operators who want to be heard.
If adopted
All importation and marketing of the covered equipment must cease 180 days after the final decision is published in the Federal Register.
8. Primary Sources
DroneLaws.us provides this information for awareness. We encourage all drone operators to review the proposal and submit their own comments.
This page provides general information about a pending federal proceeding and is not legal advice. DroneLaws.us is not affiliated with the FCC, the FAA, or any government agency. Regulatory proceedings change; verify against the primary sources above before acting. Consult a qualified attorney for advice regarding your specific situation.